Comments on: Review statistics

By: Leon Derczynski

Leon Derczynski — Tue, 01 May 2018 16:06:15 +0000

There are about 900 papers with a mean score of 4 or below (less than or equal).

By: Leon Derczynski

Leon Derczynski — Tue, 01 May 2018 16:04:53 +0000

Yes, that’s intentional.

By: Someone

Someone — Sat, 28 Apr 2018 17:40:04 +0000

In this figure, there is an x-axis mark for score 4. In other words, there are about 900 papers have a mean score less than 4 instead of a mean score less or equal to 4 ?

By: Gooner

Gooner — Wed, 25 Apr 2018 14:42:55 +0000

We don’t see reviewer confidence scores in the reviews. Is that intentional?

By: Emily M. Bender

Emily M. Bender — Wed, 25 Apr 2018 09:52:18 +0000

Thank you! It’s very nice to know that these initiatives are appreciated.

By: Leon Derczynski

Leon Derczynski — Wed, 25 Apr 2018 07:04:38 +0000

There is only one variable reported, score.

By: Leon Derczynski

Leon Derczynski — Wed, 25 Apr 2018 07:04:20 +0000

The acceptance decision process has not started, and best paper selections will be about two months from now.

By: Leon Derczynski

Leon Derczynski — Wed, 25 Apr 2018 07:03:30 +0000

Oh, no, the data is presented as a graph, not a table. The decision boundary is usually fuzzy with some “hinge loss” and so it’s not always worth going into too much detail here – instead, the general shape is shown.

By: Leon Derczynski

Leon Derczynski — Wed, 25 Apr 2018 07:02:33 +0000

If there’s an x-axis mark for it, it’s included.

By: zhe

zhe — Wed, 25 Apr 2018 05:39:17 +0000

does it exactly include a score of 4?